Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization

NeurIPS 2024

Authors: Shivang Rawat, David J. Heeger, and Stefano Martiniani

New York University

Representative figure of the model

Key takeaways

Abstract

Stability in recurrent neural models poses a significant challenge, particularly in developing biologically plausible neurodynamical models that can be seamlessly trained. Traditional cortical circuit models are notoriously difficult to train due to expansive nonlinearities in the dynamical system, leading to an optimization problem with nonlinear stability constraints that are difficult to impose. Conversely, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) excel in tasks involving sequential data but lack biological plausibility and interpretability. In this work, we address these challenges by linking dynamic divisive normalization (DN) to the stability of ORGaNICs, a biologically plausible recurrent cortical circuit model that dynamically achieves DN and that has been shown to simulate a wide range of neurophysiological phenomena. By using the indirect method of Lyapunov, we prove the remarkable property of unconditional local stability for an arbitrary-dimensional ORGaNICs circuit when the recurrent weight matrix is the identity. We thus connect ORGaNICs to a system of coupled damped harmonic oscillators, which enables us to derive the circuit's energy function, providing a normative principle of what the circuit, and individual neurons, aim to accomplish. Further, for a generic recurrent weight matrix, we prove the stability of the 2D model and demonstrate empirically that stability holds in higher dimensions. Finally, we show that ORGaNICs can be trained by backpropagation through time without gradient clipping/scaling, thanks to its intrinsic stability property and adaptive time constants, which address the problems of exploding, vanishing, and oscillating gradients. By evaluating the model's performance on RNN benchmarks, we find that ORGaNICs outperform alternative neurodynamical models on static image classification tasks and perform comparably to LSTMs on sequential tasks.

Introduction

Our work explores how a biologically-inspired recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture, known as an Oscillatory Recurrent Gated Neural Integrator Circuits (ORGaNICs), can achieve guaranteed stability while implementing divisive normalization—a core computation observed throughout the brain’s sensory processing circuits. Unlike conventional RNNs, where normalization techniques are often added as ad hoc “patches” lacking conceptual grounding, ORGaNICs include a built-in normalization mechanism that ensures stable and robust activity dynamics, regardless of the network’s size or parameter settings. This stability, proven mathematically, opens the door to training these models directly on challenging sequence tasks via standard backpropagation methods, without the need for tricky workarounds. By bridging the gap between biological plausibility and machine learning performance, ORGaNICs offer a fresh perspective on building stable, trainable, and conceptually grounded neural architectures.

ORGaNICs

ORGaNICs circuit

The two-neuron-types ORGaNICs model with \(n\) neurons of each type can be written as,

\[ \begin{split} \boldsymbol{\tau}_y \odot \dot{\mathbf{y}} &= -\mathbf{y} + \mathbf{b} \odot \mathbf{z} + \left(\mathbf{1} - \mathbf{a}^{+}\right) \odot \mathbf{W}_r \left(\sqrt{\mathbf{y}^+} - \sqrt{\mathbf{y}^-}\right) \\ \boldsymbol{\tau}_a \odot \dot{\mathbf{a}} &= -\mathbf{a} + \mathbf{b}_0^2 \odot \boldsymbol{\sigma}^2 + \mathbf{W} \left(\left(\mathbf{y}^+ + \mathbf{y}^-\right) \odot \mathbf{a}^{+2}\right) \end{split} \]

where \(\mathbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and \(\mathbf{a} \in \mathbb{R}^n\) are the membrane potentials (relative to an arbitrary threshold potential that we take to be \(0\)) of the excitatory (\(\mathbf{y}\)) and inhibitory (\(\mathbf{a}\)) neurons, evolving according to the dynamical equations defined above with \(\dot{\mathbf{y}}\) and \(\dot{\mathbf{a}}\) denoting the time derivatives. The notation \(\odot\) denotes element-wise multiplication of vectors, and squaring, rectification, square-root, and division are also performed element-wise. \(\mathbf{1}\) is an \(n\)-dimensional vector with all entries equal to 1. \(\mathbf{z} \in \mathbb{R}^n\) is the input drive to the circuit and is a weighted sum of the input, \(\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^m\), i.e., \(\mathbf{z} = \mathbf{W}_{zx} \mathbf{x}\). The firing rates, \(\mathbf{y}^\pm = \lfloor\pm\mathbf{y}\rfloor^2\) and \(\mathbf{a}^+ = \sqrt{\lfloor\mathbf{a}\rfloor}\), are rectified (\(\lfloor .\rfloor\)) power functions of the underlying membrane potentials. \(\mathbf{b} \in {\mathbb{R}^+_*}^n\) and \(\mathbf{b}_0 \in {\mathbb{R}^+_*}^n\) are the input gains for the external inputs \(\mathbf{z}\) and \(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\) fed to neurons \(\mathbf{y}\) and \(\mathbf{a}\), respectively. \({\mathbb{R}^+_*}\) is the set of positive real numbers, \(\{x \in \mathbb{R} \, | \, x > 0\}\). \(\boldsymbol{\sigma} \in {\mathbb{R}^+_*}^n\) determines the semisaturation of the responses of neurons \(\mathbf{y}\) by contributing to the depolarization of neurons \(\mathbf{a}\). \(\boldsymbol{\tau}_y \in {\mathbb{R}^+_*}^n\) and \(\boldsymbol{\tau}_a \in {\mathbb{R}^+_*}^n\) represent the time constants of \(\mathbf{y}\) and \(\mathbf{a}\) neurons.

The differential equations are designed in such a way that when \(\mathbf{W}_r = \mathbf{I}\) and \(\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{b}_0\) (i.e., with all elements equal to a constant \(b_0\)), the principal neurons follow the normalization equation exactly (and approximately when \(\mathbf{W}_r \neq \mathbf{I}\)) at steady-state:

\[ \mathbf{y}^+_s \equiv \lfloor \mathbf{y}_s \rfloor^2 = \frac{\lfloor \mathbf{z} \rfloor^2}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}^2 + \mathbf{W} \left(\lfloor \mathbf{z} \rfloor^2 + \lfloor -\mathbf{z} \rfloor^2\right)}. \]

Divisive normalization

Divisive normalization

Divisive normalization (DN) [Carandini & Heeger 2012] is a canonical neural computation proposed to explain the responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) and has since been generalized to model a wide variety of cognitive and neural processes. At its core, DN operates by dividing each neuron’s response by a weighted sum of the activity of a pool of neurons, akin to normalizing the length of a vector. This mechanism underlies various neural phenomena such as adaptation, attention, automatic gain control, decorrelation, and statistical whitening. DN's broad applicability extends across neurophysiological and psychophysical phenomena, including responses to sensory stimuli, competitive interactions in attention, and mechanisms of gain control. In addition to its biological significance, DN has parallels in artificial neural networks, generalizing normalization techniques like batch and layer normalization. Models leveraging DN have shown superior performance in machine learning tasks, highlighting its dual relevance in neuroscience and artificial intelligence. DN's ability to ensure stability, enhance trainability, and robustly explain neurophysiological observations suggests that it should be a foundational element of any neurodynamical model, offering a principled basis for understanding and simulating cortical computations.

Stability of ORGaNICs

The stability analysis of ORGaNICs with all weights and inputs arbitrarily varying is intractable. Therefore, we consider two special cases and empirically analyze the most general case.

Interpretability

Since we followed a direct Lyapunov approach to prove the stability of ORGaNICs when \(\mathbf{W}=\mathbf{I}\), we have access to the energy of ORGaNICs

Energy function

This result demonstrates that ORGaNICs minimize the residual of the instantaneously reconstructed gated input drive \(\sqrt{a}_i y_i - b_i z_i\), while also ensuring that the principal neuron's response, \(y_i\), achieves DN. The balance between these objectives is governed by the parameters and the external input strength. With fixed parameters, weaker inputs, \(z_i\), cause the model to prioritize input matching over normalization, whereas stronger inputs increasingly engage the normalization objective. Therefore, we have a normative principle of what the circuit, and individual neurons, aim to accomplish.

Classification experiments

To show the trainability of ORGaNICs using vanilla backpropagation, without using specialized techniques like gradient clipping/scaling, we train it on two classification tasks,

Discussion

Extensive research has been directed at identifying expressive RNN architectures for modeling complex data; however, advancements in biologically plausible recurrent neural circuits remain limited. In this study, we bridge these gaps by leveraging the ORGaNICs model, which dynamically implements divisive normalization (DN) in a recurrent circuit. We establish the unconditional stability of ORGaNICs for certain conditions and provide empirical evidence for arbitrary recurrent weight matrices (\(\mathbf{W}_r\)). ORGaNICs' stability mitigates exploding and oscillating gradients, allowing the use of "vanilla" BPTT without gradient clipping. Unlike conventional normalization techniques like batch and layer normalization, ORGaNICs integrate DN dynamically, leading to inherent stability and improved robustness in training. By drawing connections to coupled damped harmonic oscillators, we derive an interpretable energy function, providing insight into the relationship between normalization and stability. ORGaNICs also feature a built-in attention mechanism through input gain modulation and DN, analogous to attention heads in machine learning systems. Future work will explore multi-layer ORGaNICs with feedback connections for tasks involving long-term dependencies, further investigating their potential to implement working memory circuits capable of maintaining and manipulating information across various timescales.

BibTeX Citation

@article{rawat2024unconditional,
    title={Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization},
    author={Rawat, Shivang and Heeger, David J and Martiniani, Stefano},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18946},
    year={2024}
    }